UG sees an improvement of investigative journalism | Journalist
EXCAVATION 2015 media houses saves money but for the first time in many years see the country's top backhoe editorial change. weighment Market forces have realized that good investigative journalism is important for business.
Already on MEG days in Gothenburg started the discussion about what the future holds for investigative journalism. Today it continued in an open debate on Gräv15. Nils Hanson, Head of Mission scrutiny, saw a change in the groups' and the market's view of the investigative journalism. Among other things, he had just lost two of his best diggers who was recruited by TV4 competitor Cold Facts. - I am glad that TV4 realized the commercial value of investigative journalism. Now that George Nordmark and Hasse Johansson enlisted there is a clear sign that says Nils Hanson. Fredrik Laurin has worked for both the Swedish Television and hard facts. He is now digging manager at Swedish Radio. A company that has the same problem as many other "old media". Despite large resources - and great breadth of expertise among its employees with knowledge about everything from social media to the long story - so you are not reaching out to the younger listeners.
He took his own daughter as an example. - She is 16 years old and when her own father began to work on SR that she had no idea about Daniel Velasco dig the girl Nora. I gave her reportage on an mp3 that she could listen to and now she is talking not about anything else. It shows that our journalism involved, he says. - Our biggest challenge is not to win over each other's newsrooms. Our challenge is Google, which has annual sales most in the world of advertising. weighment We have to be where the listeners are continued Laurin. Who should get to dig in the future? One problem discussed extensively in recent years is how few women who won Guldspadens prestigious prizes. UGS editorial is one day ten men and eight women. In Cold Facts, 70 percent of the editors men. - The problem is perhaps the jury in Gold Spade? I think it is fairly evenly between the number of excavation made by women and men, so the problem may be structurally? Many times you might not see an excavation like a woman made as equal. weighment They see it as a "great news", while men digging goes before, said the journalist chief editor Helena Giertta.
Journalist chief editor Helena weighment Giertta weighment seems to think that Guldspade jury is the problem behind that more men than women are digging prices. In any case, it is how we interpret her statement from one of the seminars at the Dig 2015 and quoted on the journalisten.se on Friday: "The problem is perhaps the jury in Gold Spade? I think it is fairly evenly between the number of excavation made by women and men so the problem may be structurally? Many times you might not see an excavation like a woman made as equal. They see it as a "great news", while men digging goes before. " For us in Guldspade jury, it is difficult to understand Gierttas statement. In what way is the problem the jury? Sure, it may be that there are about as many investigative stories of female journalists and male, absolutely, weighment but to us every year about twice as many contributions from male excavators from female. It is this Guldspade jury has to start from where we then work our way through the approximately weighment 150 entries to sift out the checks to be nominated and rewarded. The imbalance in the pile submissions usually in itself smoothed weighment slightly during our briefings and a slightly higher proportion of women will thus nominated and prized compared to the distribution from the start. So also this year when seven of 16 Guldspade Prize winners were women, even though the imbalance among the submissions was considerably larger. That problem would be Guldspade jury, we have therefore hard to understand. We see it rather as a structural problem in editorial offices, weighment where managers should think about why it looks the way it does. Which lets you dig? How stimulated women in the newsroom of the work of investigative journalism? What backhoe valued so highly that they are notified to Gold Spade? The jury would like to have a gender balance in terms of both nominees and undistributed Gold Digger, but then, first and foremost more women get the opportunity to dig in editorial offices. Berth Olof Brännström for Guldspade jury reply
EXCAVATION 2015 media houses saves money but for the first time in many years see the country's top backhoe editorial change. weighment Market forces have realized that good investigative journalism is important for business.
Already on MEG days in Gothenburg started the discussion about what the future holds for investigative journalism. Today it continued in an open debate on Gräv15. Nils Hanson, Head of Mission scrutiny, saw a change in the groups' and the market's view of the investigative journalism. Among other things, he had just lost two of his best diggers who was recruited by TV4 competitor Cold Facts. - I am glad that TV4 realized the commercial value of investigative journalism. Now that George Nordmark and Hasse Johansson enlisted there is a clear sign that says Nils Hanson. Fredrik Laurin has worked for both the Swedish Television and hard facts. He is now digging manager at Swedish Radio. A company that has the same problem as many other "old media". Despite large resources - and great breadth of expertise among its employees with knowledge about everything from social media to the long story - so you are not reaching out to the younger listeners.
He took his own daughter as an example. - She is 16 years old and when her own father began to work on SR that she had no idea about Daniel Velasco dig the girl Nora. I gave her reportage on an mp3 that she could listen to and now she is talking not about anything else. It shows that our journalism involved, he says. - Our biggest challenge is not to win over each other's newsrooms. Our challenge is Google, which has annual sales most in the world of advertising. weighment We have to be where the listeners are continued Laurin. Who should get to dig in the future? One problem discussed extensively in recent years is how few women who won Guldspadens prestigious prizes. UGS editorial is one day ten men and eight women. In Cold Facts, 70 percent of the editors men. - The problem is perhaps the jury in Gold Spade? I think it is fairly evenly between the number of excavation made by women and men, so the problem may be structurally? Many times you might not see an excavation like a woman made as equal. weighment They see it as a "great news", while men digging goes before, said the journalist chief editor Helena Giertta.
Journalist chief editor Helena weighment Giertta weighment seems to think that Guldspade jury is the problem behind that more men than women are digging prices. In any case, it is how we interpret her statement from one of the seminars at the Dig 2015 and quoted on the journalisten.se on Friday: "The problem is perhaps the jury in Gold Spade? I think it is fairly evenly between the number of excavation made by women and men so the problem may be structurally? Many times you might not see an excavation like a woman made as equal. They see it as a "great news", while men digging goes before. " For us in Guldspade jury, it is difficult to understand Gierttas statement. In what way is the problem the jury? Sure, it may be that there are about as many investigative stories of female journalists and male, absolutely, weighment but to us every year about twice as many contributions from male excavators from female. It is this Guldspade jury has to start from where we then work our way through the approximately weighment 150 entries to sift out the checks to be nominated and rewarded. The imbalance in the pile submissions usually in itself smoothed weighment slightly during our briefings and a slightly higher proportion of women will thus nominated and prized compared to the distribution from the start. So also this year when seven of 16 Guldspade Prize winners were women, even though the imbalance among the submissions was considerably larger. That problem would be Guldspade jury, we have therefore hard to understand. We see it rather as a structural problem in editorial offices, weighment where managers should think about why it looks the way it does. Which lets you dig? How stimulated women in the newsroom of the work of investigative journalism? What backhoe valued so highly that they are notified to Gold Spade? The jury would like to have a gender balance in terms of both nominees and undistributed Gold Digger, but then, first and foremost more women get the opportunity to dig in editorial offices. Berth Olof Brännström for Guldspade jury reply
No comments:
Post a Comment