from havrosu Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:03 pm

This topic is so exotic that I do not know where I put it. Elsewhere I've pondered the possibilities of using track fastenings gauge 3.2 mm narrow gauge models that (1: 220, about 760 mm, but the exact conversion 704 mm) and some of you have expressed the view that the narrow gauge is not right and that I can enjoy themselves equal in size T, ie if it can handle my trembling hands and weakening eyesight candidate for retirement. So I did a search and found this. Neither the first indication 1: 450 is not accurate. 1435: 3.2 = 479.38, so it would be more accurate 1: 480th 1st Practically the only relevant manufacturer, Japanese Eishindo, whose models are available in Europe mainly through British retailer (and us through Wenceslas Podrackého) offers 4 types of so-called. Motorized chassis, ie. 4nápravových travels B'B's drives, marked the actual electronic weighing machine lengths originals, ie. 16 m, 19 m, 21 m, 23 m. 2nd actual dimensions in mm travels are as follows: size 16 m 19 m 21 m 23 m length of the bottom 35.5 39.8 45.5 49.6 Wheelbase electronic weighing machine Total 28.5 32.5 36 42.5 yd. ot. Points 24 28.5 31.5 38 blocks for suspen wheelbase. 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Conversion to the fact 1: 450 is based on the following: size of 16 m 19 m 21 m 23 m bottom 15 975 17 910 20 475 22 320 wheelbase 12 825 14 625 16 200 19 125 yd. ot.b. 10 800 12 825 14 175 17 100 chassis 2 025 2 025 2 025 2 025 V 1 480 it goes like this: the size of 16 m 19 m 21 m 23 m bottom 17040 19104 21840 23808 13680 wheelbase 15 600 17 vzd.ot.b 280 20 400 11 520 13 680 15 120 18 240 chassis 2160 2160 2160 2160 3rd Hence the fairly limited repertoire of driving vehicles, primarily involving 4nápravové motor cars. Nevertheless covers most widespread types of chassis for motor vehicles electronic weighing machine CSD and CSD from III. era to the present, ie. M 262.0, M 240.0, M 286.0 / 1, M 296.1 / 2, 854, 842, 843, 840/841. The size T one does not count rivets, but rather will depend on the overall "artistic impression". Foreign modelers already have various tricks such. Use of false masks, etc. 3 axle chassis. When you settle with that, we get at least partial compliance with dimensional large diesels as 478.x T / 75X.x, T 678 / 9.0 679.1 T, T 669.0 / 1, ER20. The advantage electronic weighing machine may be the possibility of variability used vehicles by simply "changing clothes" bodies. As I wrote last time, in my case, I'm voting paper as material. Signal electrical operation of the trolley, although it is possible, but the inconsistency with the dimensions of our electric locomotives is considerable, so for now I launched from consideration. electronic weighing machine 4th If I understand correctly, yet (?) Can not automatically electronic weighing machine connect / disconnect kit. This limits the operation of the train movement in the landscape and / or installation and / or the passage of transport without handling. Regarding the fifth track fastenings and possibilities of electrical wiring, a serious problem may be the lack of switch exchanges. On the other hand, offer a self-resetting switches, which automatically gives the opportunity to at least tack. Obviously, the sixth is primarily about the track type metro, S-bahn, tram, light rail, etc.., The "large" rail traffic mainly solo engine and / or multiple units. Who will want freight and only complete sets Pn / Sn / Rn / NEx trains. 7th There is also the option to use "Geisterwagen" cars as false locomotives. Then it would probably come into consideration as well as non-powered locomotives mock shorter. 8th If I had to go back to the narrow electronic weighing machine gauge from a scale of 1: 220 (again, electronic weighing machine the fact for 760 mm is calculated according to the track for about 1: 240) offer the TU 47.0, M 21.0, "faur" Mk 45 / Lxd2 i other. There is however a discrepancy dimensions much larger than that of the standard gauge. A ninth bead yet: When I walked out to NEM standards, came to me with good dimensional consensus vehicles Also in the period electronic weighing machine before 1968 (ie. Before supplying EMU 89.0), but in a totally insane electronic weighing machine scale of 1: 312.5 So ... the current stage of my reflections I said that really you rather than T-čko from close in and properly swing into the open countryside. But quite looking forward to your critical comments.
from havrosu Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:03 pm
havrosu writes: Gosh .... and I started to do Zetka. electronic weighing machine I almost wonder if it still nepředělat :)) So, choose a neutral měřítko.V ABC based tzv.MINIBOX if I'm not mistaken electronic weighing machine 1: 300.Ale on to your ZETKA we are really curious as to how you deal with everything.
I began to prepare documents for construction in the ZETKA and it occurred to me to try an ordinary head-in this crazy design ... it took an hour and 15 minutes ... just so quickly ... it's just that the man needed twice as much time to tear it seemed)) havrosu Posts: 36 Joined: Thu 04 Dec, 2011 10:35 am
This could also in Kinder eggs I wonder how it will be at this size with the money? Going to the track a glass box? Or how do you plan to fight dust? Kareem Posts: 239 Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2012 2:06 pm
Kareem writes: This could also in Kinder eggs I wonder how it will be at this size with the money? Going to the track a glass box? Or how do you plan to fight dust? Well again, it ZETKA, not so small. (Viz.kolejové plans